首页> 外文OA文献 >A randomised tRial of expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest centre for non-ST elevation ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest : the ARREST pilot randomised trial
【2h】

A randomised tRial of expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest centre for non-ST elevation ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest : the ARREST pilot randomised trial

机译:随机转入医院的非ST段抬高型心室纤颤快速转移至心脏骤停中心的随机试验:ARREST飞行员随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background\ud\udWide variation exists in inter-hospital survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Regionalisation of care into cardiac arrest centres (CAC) may improve this. We report a pilot randomised trial of expedited transfer to a CAC following OHCA without ST-elevation. The objective was to assess the feasibility of performing a large-scale randomised controlled trial.\ud\udMethods\ud\udAdult witnessed ventricular fibrillation OHCA of presumed cardiac cause were randomised 1:1 to either: (1) treatment: comprising expedited transfer to a CAC for goal-directed therapy including access to immediate reperfusion, or (2) control: comprising current standard of care involving delivery to the geographically closest hospital. The feasibility of randomisation, protocol adherence and data collection of the primary (30-day all-cause mortality) and secondary (cerebral performance category (CPC)) and in-hospital major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) clinical outcome measures were assessed.\ud\udResults\ud\udBetween November 2014 and April 2016, 118 cases were screened, of which 63 patients (53%) met eligibility criteria and 40 of the 63 patients (63%) were randomised. There were no protocol deviations in the treatment arm. Data collection of primary and secondary outcomes was achieved in 83%. There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the groups: 30-day mortality (Intervention 9/18, 50% vs. Control 6/15, 40%; P = 0.73), CPC 1/2 (Intervention: 9/18, 50% vs. Control 7/14, 50%; P > 0.99) or MACCE (Intervention: 9/18, 50% vs. Control 6/15, 40%; P = 0.73).\ud\udConclusions\ud\udThese findings support the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a large-scale randomised controlled trial of expedited transfer to CAC following OHCA to address a remaining uncertainty in post-arrest care.
机译:背景\ ud \ ud因院外心脏骤停(OHCA)而在院际生存中存在广泛差异。将护理区域划分为心脏骤停中心(CAC)可能会改善这一情况。我们报告了OHCA后无ST抬高的快速转移至CAC的试验性随机试验。目的是评估进行大规模随机对照试验的可行性。\ ud \ udMethods \ ud \ ud将成年人的心源性房颤OHCA假定为1:1的原因随机分配给以下任一者:(1)治疗:包括快速转移至用于目标导向疗法的CAC,包括立即进行再灌注,或(2)控制:包括当前的护理标准,包括送往地理位置最近的医院。评估了随机,方案依从性和主要(30天全因死亡率)和次要(脑功能类别(CPC))以及院内主要心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE)临床结果测量数据收集的可行性。 \ ud \ udResults \ ud \ ud在2014年11月至2016年4月之间,共筛选了118例患者,其中63例(53%)符合入选标准,并且在63例患者中有40例(63%)被随机分配。在治疗组中没有方案偏差。主要和次要结果的数据收集达到了83%。两组之间的基线特征无差异:30天死亡率(干预9 / 18,50%与对照组6 / 15,40%; P = 0.73),每次点击费用1/2(干预:9 / 18,50 %vs.对照组7/14,50%; P> 0.99)或MACCE(干预:9/18,50%vs.对照组6/15,40%; P = 0.73)。\ ud \ ud结论\ ud \ ud这些发现支持在OHCA之后进行大规模快速转移到CAC的随机对照试验的可行性和可接受性,以解决逮捕后护理中仍然存在的不确定性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号